|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
General Clinical Specialties: EndocrinologyManagement of Thyroid Cancer - What's New? |
1 Nuclear Medicine, LHSC, London, Ontario, Canada
25
Objectives: To retrospectively evaluate persistence/recurrence rates during median follow up 4.2 years (range 3-8.7 years) in patients who were prepared for radioiodine ablation by rhTSH (Thyrogen) or by thyroid hormone withdrawal (Hypo).
Methods: A web-based Thyroid cancer database was used to identify the patients. All patients with follow up longer than 3 years were included, 50 prepared with rhTSH and 126 were Hypo. Successful radioiodine ablation was defined as stimulated thyroglobulin (S-Tg) <1 ng/ml at 6-12 months post ablation.
Results: Based on the criteria listed above, successful ablation was achieved in 38/50 (76%) and 86/126 (68.3%) patients, rhTSH and Hypo groups respectively. 10 and 23 patients received additional 131I treatments and 3 and 6 had neck dissections. At the time of final analysis, 9/50 from rhTSH group (3 with persistent but stable, one- progression, one- recurrent disease, one –persistent but improving disease) and in the Hypo group, 14/126 (8 with stable disease, 3- persistent but improving, 2 with disease progression and one- with recurrent disease) had active disease with measurable S-Tg levels.
Conclusions: rhTSH and thyroid hormone withdrawal protocols have comparable rates of successful thyroid remnant ablation as well as disease recurrent rates after median follow up of 4.2 years. Since hypothyroidism has a significant negative impact on short-term as well as long-term quality of life of thyroid cancer patients, rhTSH protocol is preferable over thyroid hormone withdrawal in the majority of patients.
Research Support: Genzyme Corporation supports the database maintenance.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||