SNM Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):42P
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bandaru, V.
Right arrow Articles by Van Nostrand, D.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bandaru, V.
Right arrow Articles by Van Nostrand, D.

General Clinical Specialties: General Practice-Oncology

General PET-CT and Abdominal Malignancies

Effective reduction of brown fat (BF) uptake of 18-FDG by controlling environmental temperature (CET) prior to positron emission tomography scan (PET)

Varalakshmi Bandaru1, Carlos Garcia1, Young-Rok Shin1, Calvin Butler1, Elmo Acio1, Kanchan Kulkarni1 and Douglas Van Nostrand1

1 Div Nuc Med, Wash Hosp Ctr, Wash, District of Columbia

168

Objectives: BF uptake of 18-FDG on PET limits the ability to assess for cancer. We previously reported a significant decrease in BF 18-FDG uptake by CET in patients (pts) without the use of drugs [Mol Imag Bio 2006;8:24]. The objective of this study was to expand and validate our initial series of only 10 pts regarding the effectiveness of CET to reduce BF 18-FDG uptake on PET.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed (Jan 2002-Oct 2007) of pts who had 1) a pattern of 18-FDG uptake on non-CET PET consistent with BF, 2) no evidence of cancer by CT in the regions of interest noted below, 3) a repeat scan with CET within 4 mo of the 1st PET, and 4) no change in the use of drugs known to reduce BF 18-FDG uptake (e.g. benzodiazepine, B-blockers, reserpine). The technique for performing 18-FDG PET and CET is available in the above reference. The non-CET and CET PET images were blinded/randomized, and 3 physicians assessed 3 regions (right/left neck and paraspinal area) semiquantitatively by the following scale: 0 (background [bkgd]), 1+ (> bkgd, < liver), 2+ (equal to liver), 3+ (> liver). SUV data was recorded. Results were analyzed using a 2-tail T-test.

Results: Of 8640 18-FDG PETs performed, 30 pts met the above criteria. The median age was 36 (range 12-60) with 4 males/26 females. The mean/standard deviation of the differences (non-CET minus CET) of the grades for right neck, left neck and paraspinal regions were for reader 1:(2.1/1.37), (1.95/1.43), (1.85/1.26); reader 2 (2.3/1.40), (1.70/1.13), (1.77/1.13); reader 3 (2.17/1.17), (2.20/1.18), (0.50/1.30). For maximum SUV scores: (3.4/2.9), (3.3/2.9), (1.77/1.13). All p values were <0.001.

Conclusions: In an expanded series, our study validated that CET effectively reduces 18-FDG uptake in BF on PET.





Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bandaru, V.
Right arrow Articles by Van Nostrand, D.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bandaru, V.
Right arrow Articles by Van Nostrand, D.