SNM Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     




J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):41P
This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oyen, W.
Right arrow Articles by Ruers, T.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oyen, W.
Right arrow Articles by Ruers, T.

General Clinical Specialties: Operations/Practice Based/Outcomes Research

Siemens Award for Excellence in Practice Based Research

Improved selection of patients for hepatic surgery of colorectal liver metastases with FDG-PET: A randomized study

Wim Oyen1, Bastiaan Wiering2, Joost van der Sijp3, Rudi Roumen4, Koert de Jong5, Emile Comans6, Jan Pruim7, Helena Dekker8, Paul Krabbe9 and Theo Ruers2

1 Nuclear Medicine; 2 Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands; 3 Surgery, VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 4 Surgery, MMC, Veldhoven, Netherlands; 5 Surgery, UMC Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; 6 Nuclear Medicine, VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 7 Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, UMC Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; 8 Radiology; 9 MTA, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands

161

Objectives: Careful selection of patients who may benefit from surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases is critical. Staging by PET with FDG is thought to be better than CT staging alone. Evidence that the addition of FDG-PET leads to superior clinical results and improved clinical management in these patients are lacking. In this randomised controlled trial, we investigated whether the addition of FDG-PET is beneficial and reduces the number of futile laparotomies.

Methods: 150 patients with colorectal liver metastases selected for surgical treatment by imaging with CT scan were randomly assigned to CT imaging only (n=75) or CT imaging plus FDG-PET (n=75). Primary outcome measure was futile laparotomy, defined as any laparotomy that did not result in complete tumour treatment, that revealed benign disease or that did not result in a disease free survival period longer than 6 months.

Results: Clinical characteristics were similar for both groups. The number of futile laparotomies was 34 (45%) in the group without PET and 21 (28%) in the group with PET, the relative risk reduction was 38% (95%CI = 4%-60%).

Conclusions: Addition of FDG- PET to the work-up for surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases prevents unnecessary surgery in one out of six patients.

Research Support: Supported by ZonMW (DO 2001 #945-10-017)





This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oyen, W.
Right arrow Articles by Ruers, T.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oyen, W.
Right arrow Articles by Ruers, T.