SNM Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     




J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):394P
This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Krol, A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Krol, A.

Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Image Generation

Image Generation Posters

Attenuation compensation in a content adaptive singularity-based mesh-domain SPECT reconstruction

Xiaofei Hu2, Hongwei Ye3, Yao Lu2, Levon Vogelsang3, Yuesheng Xu2, David Feiglin1 and Andrzej Krol1

1 Radiology, SUNY, Syracuse, New York; 2 Math; 3 Physics, SU, Syracuse, New York

1659

Objectives: To apply attenuation compensation in irregular mesh-based SPECT forward projection and tomographic reconstruction.

Methods: We performed analytical and Monte Carlo simulations of parallel-beam SPECT for a digital chest phantom and a simple geometrical phantom. The two-step reconstruction process consists of: First, reconstruction in pixel domain using OSEM algorithm with line-length system model. Second, a singularity-based mesh is generated from this initial reconstruction using wavelets transform and OSEM reconstruction is performed in mesh-domain with the mesh-domain system matrix. Three approaches for attenuation compensation were investigated: Approach 0, nodal ray approximation, assumes that all photons emitted from mesh elements originate from the associated nodes. Approach 1, average central ray approximation, and Approach 2, individual central ray approximation, assume that all photons emitted from mesh elements intersecting with a tube-of-response (TOR) of the detector originate from mid points of the sections of TOR within the mesh elements of interest. In Approach 1, we estimate the attenuation correction factors as an average attenuation along the ray traversing all mesh elements to which the node belongs. In Approach 2, we estimate the attenuation correction factors individually for each central ray segment within all mesh elements associated with the node.

Results: Approaches 0 and 1 resulted in similar sinograms and images with 15% relative error, as compared to pixel-domain technique. Approach 2 resulted in a significantly smaller relative error (below 5%).

Conclusions: We conclude that Approach 2 to attenuation compensation in mesh-domain SPECT reconstruction results in relatively small errors that are acceptable for practical applications.





This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Krol, A.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Krol, A.