SNM Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):359P
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baba, S.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baba, S.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.

Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Clinical Diagnosis-Solid Tumors Posters

Clinical significance of abdominal/pelvic PET/CT findings for staging with head and neck malignancies

Shingo Baba1, Koichiro Abe1, Koichiro Kaneko1, Takuro Isoda1, Masayuki Sasaki2 and Hiroshi Honda1

1 Clinical Radiology; ; 2 Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

1517

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical significance of abdominal/pelvic PET/CT findings in initial and restaging after therapy of patient with head and neck malignancies.

Methods: A review of 292 consecutive whole-body FDG PET/CT data of various head and neck malignancies (cancer from pharyngeal; 68, laryngeal; 32, tongue; 55, gingival; 28, salivary grand; 13, external ear canal; 7, oral floor; 11 and thyroid; 78) was performed to identify metastatic lesion. PET/CT data was analyzed for the presence of metastatic disease in the neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis.

Results: Total of 292 patients with head and neck malignancy (160 females and 132 males, age 17-76 years) received initial or restaging scans. Amongst those patients for initial-staging scan (102), 8 patients (7.8%) displayed definite abnormal uptake in abdominal/pelvic area. Of those 8 patients, 2 unknown and one known bone metastases were identified. Other 5 abnormal uptakes were turned out to be minor abnormalities (physiological uptakes or adrenal incidentaloma etc.). Amongst those patients for re-staging (190), 23 patients (12.1%) displayed abnormal uptake in abdominal/pelvic area. Of those 23 patients, 3 identified additional metastases and 4 identified newly found other malignancies and 5 identified known metastases. Other 11 abnormal uptakes were turned out to be minor abnormalities. Therapy planning has been changed by FDG/PET findings of abdominal/pelvic area in 6 patients received re-staging scan and no patient for initial staging scan.

Conclusions: The utility of PET/CT scan of the lower abdomen and pelvis is limited for initial staging for head and neck malignancies, while still useful for re-staging.





Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baba, S.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baba, S.
Right arrow Articles by Honda, H.