|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Solid TumorsClinical Diagnosis-Solid Tumors Posters |
1 Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Ctr, New York, New York
1478
Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the accuracy of FDG PET/CT in comparison and in addition to HDCT done with DPCT in the evaluation of recurrent PC.
Methods: A total of 82 lesions were evaluated on 29 PET/CT and HDCT/DPCT at restaging of PC pts. The accuracy of PET/CT and HDCT/DPCT was compared and incremental value of both modalities was assessed. The results were confirmed by pathology (n=15) or follow-up (median 6 mo).
Results: Overall, PET/CT had a higher accuracy than HDCT. There were 10 equivocal HDCT results(no equivocals on PET/CT). Combined PET/CT and HDCT yielded a higher specificity (SP) and positive predictive value (PPV) than each method alone regardless of equivocals considered positive or negative.
|
The majority of recurrences were in the liver and pancreatic bed. For liver lesions, the SP, PPV and accuracy of combined PET/CT and HDCT was superior to each method alone. For pancreatic bed lesions, all statistical measures for combined PET/CT and HDCT were as high as for PET/CT, and superior to HDCT.
Conclusions: The accuracy of combined PET/CT and HDCT is superior to either method alone in detection of recurrent PC. Although our results should be reproduced in a larger sample size, combined PET/HDCT approach is promising for increasing accuracy in detection of recurrent PC.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||