SNM Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     




J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):347P
This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yasuda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Makuuchi, H.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yasuda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Makuuchi, H.

Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Solid Tumors

Clinical Diagnosis-Solid Tumors Posters

Efficacy of PET/CT for colorectal cancer screening

S. Yasuda1, K. Kobayashi2, T. Katoh2, M. Itoh2, M. Ohta2, T. Kojima2, N. Ushimi2, K. Akiyama2, H. Nakajoh2 and H. Makuuchi1

1 Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan; 2 Yotsuya Medical Cube, Tokyo, Japan

1466

Objectives: PET has potential for screening colorectal carcinoma (CRC). However, physiologic bowel uptake (PBU) may hamper detection of CRC. We evaluated the efficacy of PET/CT for CRC screening.

Methods: From May 2005 to June 2007, 1968 asymptomatic individuals (1188 men, 780 women, 54.6±11.8 yo) underwent 2351 PET/CT studies. PET/CT images were evaluated visually, and findings were classified prospectively as 1) positive: localized FDG uptake and presence of CRC was suspected; 2) equivocal: localized FDG uptake but distinction between CRC and PBU was difficult; 3) negative: no apparent FDG uptake; or 4) not evaluable (NE): evaluation was impossible because of PBU. PET findings were compared to subsequent colonoscopic findings.

Results: The incidence of positive or equivocal findings was 2.8% (Table). 37/66 cases (56%) underwent colonoscopy, and 14 lesions were detected in 13 subjects: 7 CRCs, 6 adenomas, and 1 ulcerative lesion. PPV of a PET-positive result was 40%. The CRC detection rate was 0.3% (7/2351 studies) and exceeded the reported detection rate of 0.15% by fecal occult blood test. The carcinoma and adenoma detection rates were 0.6% (12/1968 individuals). The incidence of incomplete screening resulting from PBU was 1.7%.

Conclusions: PET/CT is potentially efficacious for CRC screening. Carcinoma or adenoma can be incidentally detected during PET/CT study at a rate of not less than 0.3-0.6%.


Figure 1





This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yasuda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Makuuchi, H.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yasuda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Makuuchi, H.