SNM Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     




J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):338P
This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coughlan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Torigian, D.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Coughlan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Torigian, D.

Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Hematologic Tumors

Hematology Malignancy

Correlation of clinical outcome with FDG-PET based response of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) to radioimmunotherapy (RIT)

Kimberly Coughlan1, Simin Dadparvar1, Miguel Pampaloni1, Elise Chong1, Jian Yu2, Abass Alavi1 and Drew Torigian1

1 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 2 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

1432

Objectives: We correlated FDG-PET response with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of NHL subjects following RIT.

Methods: Subjects with FDG-PET within 3 months before and after RIT for lymphoma were included. A nuclear medicine physician blindly interpreted the PET studies. Treatment responses based on pre-RIT and post-RIT FDG-PET results were recorded in along with clinical follow-up (f/u).

Results: 23 subjects (M=13, F=10, median age 54) with FDG-PET who received either Zevalin (14) or Bexxar (9) RIT for NHL were included. Subtypes of NHL were as follows: 10 follicular, 8 diffuse large B-cell, 4 mantle cell, and 1 marginal zone lymphoma. FDG-PET based response of NHL to RIT was: 6 (26%) complete response (CR), 5 (22%) partial response (PR), 7 (30%) stable disease (SD), and 5 (22%) progressive disease (PD). Of 11 subjects who responded on PET, 7 (64%) had eventual clinical progression (mean PFS=14.9 mo, range=0–55.13mo), whereas mean PFS for non-responders was 6.96 mo (range=0-31.43mo). Eight (73%) of 11 PET responders were alive at last f/u, whereas only 4 (33%) of 12 PET non-responders were alive at last f/u (range of last f/u=2.83-59.80mo). OS was 39.5mo for PET responders and 16.8mo for PET non-responders. PET responders had statistically significant longer PFS and OS than PET non-responders (p=0.004 and p<0.0001, respectively, unpaired t test).

Conclusions: Response to RIT, as evaluated by FDG-PET, is significantly associated with PFS and OS in subjects with NHL.

Research Support: EAC acknowledges Jim and Frannie Maguire for their support.





This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coughlan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Torigian, D.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Coughlan, K.
Right arrow Articles by Torigian, D.