SNM Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):30P
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Holz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F.

Cardiovascular: Basic Science

New Approaches Using SPECT, PET and Hybrid Imaging

Expanding versatility of cardiac PET-CT: Feasibility of delayed contrast enhancement CT for infarct detection in pig model

Andrew Holz1, Lautamaki Riikka1, Tetsuo Sasano2, Roselle Abraham2, Albert Lardo2, Stephan Nekolla3 and Frank Bengel1

1 Radiology and Radiological Sciences; ; 2 Cardiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; ; 3 Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

118

Objectives: CT can detect infarct at high resolution by delayed myocardial contrast enhancement. In cardiac PET-CT, this may allow for replacement of rest perfusion studies and improved localization of viability and PET-derived molecular signals. This study sought to determine the feasibility of CT delayed enhancement in cardiac PET-CT, and to compare it to PET-defined rest perfusion.

Methods: We studied 7 pigs 4-6 weeks post-myocardial infarction(LAD occlusion/reperfusion). Using 64-slice PET-CT, perfusion was measured by rest N-13 ammonia PET. 120ml of contrast was given and retrospectively gated helical CT was performed after 1.5, 5, 10, and 15min delay. Two days later, contrast CT using a low radiation dose approach(calcium scoring) and same delays was performed. Polarmaps of PET perfusion and CT myocardial enhancement were created for analysis.

Results: HU in the infarct exceeded arterial blood at 5-10min after contrast, and ratios for infarct/remote myocardium and infarct/blood plateaued around 1.9 and 1.2 between 10-15min. There was excellent agreement between high- and low-dose acquisition(r=.87; p<.001). At 10min, infarct size was 33±5%LV using low dose CT(HU threshold >3.5sd from remote). PET perfusion defect was comparable at 35±6%LV(threshold 60% of max). Using a 16-segment model, there was excellent inverse relationship between ammonia retention and contrast enhancement(r=-.87; p<.001).

Conclusions: Infarct size can be measured in cardiac PET-CT using delayed CT contrast enhancement and a low-dose CT similar to calcium scoring. This will increase the versatility and integrative potential of clinical cardiac PET-CT.





Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Holz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F.