SNM Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     




J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):251P
This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, J.
Right arrow Articles by Haygood, T.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wong, J.
Right arrow Articles by Haygood, T.

General Clinical Specialties: General Practice-Oncology

General Practice-Oncology Posters

Incidence of skeletal muscle metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

Jason Wong2, John Madewell1, Rodolfo Nunez1, Colleen Costelloe1, Rajendra Kumar1, Henry Yeung1 and Tamara Haygood1

1 MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 2 University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada


Formula

1073

Objectives: Determine frequency of skeletal muscle metastases (SMM) as found by routine PET/CT studies and describe their appearance on these images.

Methods: 2D PET imaging was performed 1 hour after IV administration of F18-labeled FDG. Non-contrast CT was performed from the top of the skull through the proximal thighs. Included patients had NSCLC and received initial staging or routine re-staging PET/CT investigations at our cancer hospital between 19 May 2006 and 19 Oct 2006. Reports of the patients’ PET/CT studies were reviewed for any mention of potential SMM. The PET/CT images, other imaging studies, and medical record for patients with potential SMM were further evaluated to confirm SMM and describe their appearance.

Results: 433 patients with NSCLC had PET/CT studies at our institution during the selected timeframe. Reports from 42 (9.7%) contained language that raised suspicion for SMM. After reviewing the images and medical records, 7 patients (1.6%) had at least 1 SMM. SMM were first discovered by CT of the abdomen in 1 and by PET/CT in 5 patients. Of these 5 patients, 3 lesions were missed on preceding contrast CT studies but visible in retrospect. Discovery of the SMM affected management in one case. The final SMM was missed by PET/CT reporting but was picked up for this study on investigation of other findings. On PET/CT, the SMM was a round area of increased activity in 6 cases and was fusiform in 1 case. SMM were nearly invisible on non-contrast CT.

Conclusions: An incidence of 1.6% of SMM on routine PET/CT evaluation indicates that SMM, though less common than many other sites, are not rare in patients with NSCLC. PET/CT is a relatively sensitive modality for their discovery. SMM may result in upstaging of tumors and may change management.





This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, J.
Right arrow Articles by Haygood, T.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wong, J.
Right arrow Articles by Haygood, T.