|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Instrumentation & Data Analysis: Data Analysis & ManagementQuantitative Methods |
1 Banner Alzheimer's Inst, Phoenix, Arizona; 2 Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, Maryland; 3 Univ of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 4 Univ of Calif SF, San Francisco, California; 5 Univ of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; 6 Univ of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; 7 Univ of Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, California
91
Objectives: Distribution volume ratio (DVR) provides a quantitative index of fibrillar amyloid deposition in PIB-PET studies. We introduce a more computationally efficient method for estimating PIB DVR than non-linear fitting.
Methods: Data from 5 subjects were included. The generalized linear least square (GLLS) technique (Chen et al., 1998) was re-derived for the reference tissue model with 3 parameters (RTM3P) with a common k2R (Zhou, et al, 2007), simultaneously estimating PIB DVR and R1 (tracer extraction relative to the reference region). DVR was estimated by GLLS and the RTM3P non-linear fitting over a number of cerebral ROI. The two approaches were compared by linearly regressing GLLS DVR against RTM3P DVR and examining the closeness of the regression slope/intercept to 1.0/0.0 and the correlation coefficient to 1.0. GLLS generated DVR parametric image were also compared to those using the Logan method.
Results: GLLS generated the DV/R1 parametric images in under a few minutes. GLLS-derived DVR was similar to that of the nonlinear RTM3P (regression slope 1.02, intercept=-0.074, correlation coefficient R=0.987, p=1.2e-11). The DVR parametric images by GLLS resembled those by Logan with the regression slopes ranging from 1.06 to 1.09.
Conclusions: GLLS is accurate and computationally efficient in estimating DVR and R1. Further studies are needed for its use in the differential diagnosis, early detection and tracking of AD.
Research Support: ADNI, Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||