|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Oncology-Clinical Diagnosis: Solid TumorsGenitourinary Cancers |
1 University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
84
Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of 18F-fluoride PET/CT for detecting bone metastases in patients with breast or prostate cancer, using full diagnostic CT or MRI as gold standard.
Methods: We prospectively included 47 pts with breast (N= 31) or prostate (N=16) cancer and clinical (bone pain) or biological (PSA or CA 15-3) suspicion of metastatic disease. Whole-body PET/ CT (PET:1 to 2 min. per bed position, low-dose CT) was acquired 45 min. after injecting 300 MBq 18F- fluoride. Bone scintigraphies (BS, n=47, including 33 with SPECT) were obtained using a dual-head camera. Each dataset (PET and BS) was interpreted blindly and separately. All foci were recorded and classified as malignant, equivocal or benign. Thin-slice CT or MRI were then performed and blindly read by an experimented radiologist.
Results: Out of 810 foci detected by PET/CT and/or BS, 498 (61.5%) could be verified by CT or MRI, with a final diagnosis of 304 metastases and 194 benign lesions. In breast cancer, considering equivocal foci as benign, the sensitivity was 78.3% for PET/CT and 37.4% for BS with specificity of 69.6% and 75.4%, respectively. For lytic lesions only, the sensitivity was 50% and 23.3%. PET/CT was particularly sensitive for pelvic and thoracic localizations. In prostate cancer, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 93.2% for PET/CT and 66.7% and 91.7% for BS. All lesions considered the accuracy was 78.7% for PET/CT and 55.4% for BS. PET/CT provided a correct diagnosis (M+/M0) in 45/47 pts (96%, 2 FP), as compared to 37/47 with BS (79%, 6 FP, 4 FN).
Conclusions: 18F-Fluoride PET/CT is more accurate than 99mTc-MDP BS for detecting bone metastases from prostate and breast cancer. Our lower sensitivity for PET/CT, compared to the literature, is probably due to a more stringent gold standard.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||