SNM Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     




J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):214P
This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, V.
Right arrow Articles by Skovronsky, D.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, V.
Right arrow Articles by Skovronsky, D.

Neurosciences: Neurology

Neurology Posters

Clinical evaluation of AV-138 for PET amyloid imaging

Val Lowe1, Bradley Kemp1, Mark Jacobson1, Ronald Petersen1, Bradley Boeve1, David Knopman1, Michael Pontecorvo2, Raj Manchanda2 and Daniel Skovronsky2

1 Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; 2 Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

922

Objectives: C11 PIB PET has been shown to correlate with the presence amyloid in neurodegenerative disease. The short half-life of C11 PIB makes its clinical use problematic. F18-PET amyloid ligands would be preferable. Brain amyloid imaging with F18 AV-138 was evaluated.

Methods: Four normal control (MMSE median 29.5) subjects (NC) and mild to moderate 5 Alzheimer’s Disease (MMSE median 22, range 14-24) subjects (AD) were imaged with 18F AV-138 PET. Subjects received 5 mCi, (mean 4.6, range 3.0-5.5) of 18F AV-138 and thereafter dynamic brain PET imaging for 3 hrs was performed. Regional brain accumulation was evaluated with Logan plot analysis over 90 minutes to obtain a DVR and a 40-60 minute frame set was used to obtain a delay phase uptake ratio (DUR). Cortical ROIs were normalized to cerebellum. PET image volumes were co-registered the individuals' MRI scans. MRI scans were spatially normalized to the MNI template by which regions were defined. Global DVR and DUR ratios were calculated using a summation of pre-frontal, orbito-frontal, parietal, temporal, anterior cingulate, and posterior cingulate regional activity. Results from normal and AD subjects were compared.

Results: DVR:DUR mean global values were 1.15:1.17 and 1.50:1.49 for NC and AD subjects respectively which showed good separation of the groups (p=0.030 for DVR and p=0.056 for DUR). Bland Altman plot comparing the DVR and DUR methods suggested good correlation.The DUR for 11C PIB and 18F AV-138 in single AD patient was 2.23 and 1.53 respectively, and was 1.10 and 1.11 in a single NC subject.

Conclusions: 18F AV-138 PET is able to distinguish NC from AD subjects.

Research Support: Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc.





This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, V.
Right arrow Articles by Skovronsky, D.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, V.
Right arrow Articles by Skovronsky, D.