SNM Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     




J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):1P
This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lautamäki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lautamäki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F.

Cardiovascular: Special Sessions

Cardiovascular Council Young Investigator Award Symposium

82Rb PET-CT for quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow–validation in a canine model of coronary artery stenosis

Riikka Lautamäki1, Richard George1, Kakuya Kitakawa1, Jennifer Merrill1, Corina Voicu1, Anthony DiPaula1, Stephan Nekolla1, João Lima1, Albert Lardo1 and Frank Bengel1

1 Johns Hopkins U, Baltimore, Maryland

1

Objectives: Quantification of myocardial blood flow(MBF)expands the diagnostic potential of PET for assessment of diffuse coronary artery disease,microvascular dysfunction,and therapeutic effects. Using 82Rb, current clinical perfusion analysis is still mostly limited to qualitative approaches.We evaluated the feasibility of MBF quantification using state-of-the-art hybrid PET-CT methodology.

Methods: 9 dogs were prepared with experimental coronary artery stenosis, followed by hybrid PET-CT imaging. PET was performed for 8min after intravenous injection of 82Rb, during adenosine-induced vasodilation. Microspheres were used simultaneously for reference MBF. CT angiography was performed and co-registered with perfusion data to assign the myocardial regions to the stenotic vessel territory. Two methods for MBF calculation were employed:2-compartment model(2C)including spillover term, and retention index(RET).

Results: Without correction, significant underestimation occurred at higher flow due to nonlinear 82Rb extraction. When applying previously established correction algorithms, MBF-2C was in good agreement with microsphere flow (y=0.20+0.84x; r=0.92, P<0.0001), although there was variability in the physiologic flow range below 3ml/g/min (y=0.53+0.54x; r=0.53, P=0.042). MBF-RET also correlated well with microsphere flow (y=0.52+0.47x; r=0.75, P=0.0004). Error increased with higher flow, but correlation was good in the physiologic range (y=0.29+0.62x; r=0.84, P=0.0001).

Conclusions: Using state-of-the-art PET-CT systems, quantification of MBF is feasible with 82Rb. Approach based on tracer retention is practicable in the physiologic flow range. These results encourage further testing of robustness and usefulness in the clinical context of cardiac hybrid imaging.





This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lautamäki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lautamäki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F.