SNM Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     




J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):198P
This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Javadi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Javadi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F.

Cardiovascular: Clinical Science

Clinical Science Posters

Lowering radiation dose for integrated assessment of coronary morphology and its functional consequences: First experience with step-and-shoot CT angiography in the PET/CT environment

Mehrbod Javadi1, Jennifer Merrill1, William Epley1, Gerald McBride1, Voicu Corina1, Madhadevappa Mahesh1 and Frank Bengel1

1 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

858

Objectives: Reduction of radiation exposure from CT coronary angiography (CTA) will be a key factor for more liberal use in cardiac hybrid PET-CT. We tested the feasibility of a new algorithm for low dose CT angiography based on a prospectively gated step-and-shoot technique. This limits acquisition to the diastolic phase and minimizes exposure time versus the previous standard of retrospectively gated helical acquisitions.

Methods: In 10 patients referred for biomorphologic workup by Rb-82 perfusion PET-CT, step-and-shoot CTA (SnapShot Pulse, GE Healthcare; 120kV, 600-800mA) was acquired on a 64-slice GE Discovery Rx VCT PET-CT scanner, and compared to patients with conventional helical CTA (120 kV, mA modulated), matched for clinical variables. Effective dose was estimated from dose length product. The AHA 17 segment coronary tree model was used to determine study interpretability. Potential for fusion with PET was tested using commercial software.

Results: Effective dose for helical and step-and-shoot CTA was 20.3±4.0 vs 5.6±1.1 mSv(p<0.0001). Evaluable segments for the best phase of helical CTA were 14.6±2.6(86±15%) vs 15.4±1.8(91±11%; p=ns vs helical) for step-and-shoot. Review of multiple phases increased the number for helical to 15.9±1.3(94±8%; p=ns vs step-and-shoot, where this was not an option). Fusion with corresponding Rb-82 perfusion PET was feasible for all studies.

Conclusions: Low dose prospectively gated CTA reduces radiation exposure by approximately 75% vs the previous standard of helical acquisition, without significant loss in interpretability and integrative potential with PET. This represents a first step towards a broad, routine integration of CTA and PET in cardiac PET-CT.





This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Javadi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Javadi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bengel, F.