SNM Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     




J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):143P
This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oh, S.
Right arrow Articles by Baum, R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oh, S.
Right arrow Articles by Baum, R.

Oncology-Basic Science: Therapy, Metrics & Intervention

Imaging for Assesment of Response or Therapy Planning

Monitoring response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with metastasized neuroendocrine tumors (NET): Quantitative intra-individual comparison between Ga-68-DOTA-NOC, F-18-FDG-PET/CT, and CT alone

Sowon Oh1, Vikas Prasad2, Dong Soo Lee1 and Richard Baum2

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul Nat'l Univ. Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine/Center for PET/CT, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany

571

Objectives: Response to PRRT was monitored using Ga-68-DOTA-NOC-somatostatin-receptor-PET/CT (SSR-PET, "molecular response") in comparison to F-18-FDG-PET/CT (FDG, "metabolic response") and contrast-enhanced CT alone (ceCT, "morphologic response").

Methods: In 25 patients (57.5±13.4 years) with metastasized NETs, 138 discrete lesions were analyzed by SSR-PET, FDG and ceCT alone, pre and post treatment (up to 3 cycles). RECIST criteria for ceCT, and modified EORTC criteria for SSR-PET and FDG were applied to assess the response. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were measured, and a Response Index (RI= 100 x [(post-PRRT SUVmax)-(pre-PRRT SUVmax)] / pre-PRRT SUVmax) was calculated for each lesion. ROC was calculated for SSR-SUVmax of metastatic liver lesions. SD, PR, and PD were determined for response assessment and correlated with clinical/biochemical improvement.

Results: No significant correlation was found amongst the three different modalities. Molecular response were seen in 13 patients (PR 60%, SD 24%, PD 16%), and metabolic responses in 6 patients (PR 36%, SD 55%, PD 9%), respectively, whereas ceCT alone showed either SD (64%) or PD or PR (16% each). The cut-off value of SSR-SUVmax >2.5 predicted molecular response of metastatic liver lesions to PRRT with a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 71.4%.

Conclusions: Ga-68-DOTA-NOC-SMS-receptor-PET/CT is superior to ceCT alone for the early assessment of response to PRRT in metastatic NET ("molecular response precedes morphology").





This Article
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oh, S.
Right arrow Articles by Baum, R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Oh, S.
Right arrow Articles by Baum, R.